home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group96a.txt
/
000101_icon-group-sender _Mon Apr 22 20:37:23 1996.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1996-09-05
|
824b
Received: by cheltenham.cs.arizona.edu; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 08:20:57 MST
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1996 20:37:23 -0500
Message-Id: <199604230137.UAA23142@ns1.computek.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: gep2@computek.net
Subject: Re: Why isn't Icon more widely used?
To: Hamish Lawson <H.Lawson@tees.ac.uk>
Cc: icon-group@cs.arizona.edu
In-Reply-To: <317BCD4B.3C65@tees.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@cs.arizona.edu
Status: O
The really good question is why Perl is so widely used in Web CGI scripts, where
ICON could probably do the job a great deal better!
This is a major new area IMHO where ICON could make a big impact, if it could be
better known.
Gordon Peterson
http://www.computek.net/public/gep2/